Tag Archive for Nonprofit Board

The Tax Exempt and Government Entities Group (“TE/GE”) Releases 2017 Work Plan

The Tax Exempt and Government Entities Group (TE/GE) of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently released its Fiscal Year 2017 (FY2017) Work Plan. The work plan summarizes the IRS’s accomplishments for FY2016 and outlines its focus for FY2017.

TE/GE explains that it is focusing on improving processes and doing more with less. The work plan states that the department’s gold standard for any new program or process change will be that it is transparent, efficient and effective.

The use of “data-driven decision making” for audit selection is one iStock_000010827673_Smallof the IRS’s more important and effective process changes. The IRS previously indicated that there are over 190 queries in its data-driven case selection technique for Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax. The filters used in its return selection modeling process for examination of Forms 990 have not been made public, though tax-exempt organizations and their tax advisors are certainly aware of many of the exposure areas. Please see our blog published in February 2016 that highlights some common audit selection indicators.

The five strategic issue areas for FY2017 are a continuation of the FY2016 IRS work-plan focuses, and include the following:

Exemption – issues such as non-exempt purpose activity and private inurement.

Protection of assets – issues including self-dealing, excess benefit transactions and loans to disqualified persons.

Tax gap – tax liabilities arising from employment tax and from unrelated business income tax – audit adjustments for items such as excessive expense allocations, net operating loss deductions, rental activity, advertising, debt-financed rental and investment income.

International – issues such as funds spent outside the U.S., exempt organizations operating as foreign conduits and Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) filing requirements.

Emerging issues – such issues as non-exempt charitable trusts and the new compliance requirements for tax-exempt hospitals.

The Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements group is expecting to continue to improve processing and timeliness of applications for tax-exemption. To increase its efficiency, last year the IRS began to reject incomplete applications, which they return with an explanation of the reason for the rejection. This ensures that only completed applications are assigned to review agents for review, thereby allowing for a more efficient and speedy process.

The IRS’s examination group is expecting to review private foundation returns that have irregularities. They are also planning on developing an “ongoing rolling statistical sample” review of tax-exempt organizations to assess the overall level of compliance of the exempt organization community. The IRS’s Exempt Organizations Examinations plans are expected to identify and address high-risk areas of noncompliance with the federal tax laws applicable to tax-exempt organizations.

Please contact us if you would like to discuss how the FY17 IRS work plan may affect your organization

For more information please contact Laura J. Kenney at lkenney@blumshapiro.com or at 617.221.1944.

BlumShapiro offers the accounting, tax and business consulting expertise non-profits need today. We are one of the largest non-profit accounting service providers in New England, our blend of accounting expertise and knowledge of non-profit organizations means we can offer you tremendous added value. We can assist you in complying with state and federal grant requirements, charitable giving rules, capital campaigns, endowment fund responsibilities and other specialized needs. Learn more >>

Laura J. Kenney, CPA
Tax Director

View Laura’s Bio Here >>

Disclaimer: Any written tax content, comments, or advice contained in this article is limited to the matters specifically set forth herein. Such content, comments, or advice may be based on tax statues, regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof and we have no obligation to update any content, comments or advice for retroactive or prospective changes to such authorities. This communication is not intended to address the potential application of penalties and interest, for which the taxpayer is responsible, that may be imposed for non-compliance with tax law.

Setting Executive Compensation: How Much is Too Much?

This is part of a series of articles focused on issues relevant to non-profit boards of directors

shutterstock_46389259In recent articles, I have outlined the roles and responsibilities of non-profit boards and focused on the legal and ethical responsibilities of individual non-profit board members. Now, I want to spotlight one very important task non-profit board members must complete carefully and strategically: setting executive compensation.

A non-profit’s chief executive is often the heart, soul and public face of the organization. The chief executive is responsible for leading and coaching staff members; overseeing revenue-generating and fundraising activities; making final strategic decisions to ensure the organization’s mission is advanced; and countless other day-to-day tasks.

Clearly, the chief executive position is vitally important to the overall success of any non-profit organization. So, how do you put a dollar value on something so important? In today’s hyper-competitive environment, non-profit organizations across the country are struggling to answer that question.

As we discussed in my previous article, the board of directors has the responsibility of hiring and setting compensation for executive leadership.

Study the marketplace: Of course, every non-profit organization wants to hire their first choice for the executive director role–but many quickly learn they’ve only budgeted for their third, fourth, or fifth choice.

Before going through the process of selecting a new chief executive, non-profit boards must find out the “going rate” for that position. That means analyzing the salaries and benefits of comparable positions in private, public, and non-profit sectors and comparing those salaries to what the organization is prepared to offer. Having in-depth knowledge of the current marketplace will help your board set expectations and budget appropriately.

Protect your bottom line: The board needs to find middle ground between compensation that attracts the top talent and cost-cutting strategies that help the organization fund its services. That means offering a salary range that the IRS calls, “reasonable and not excessive.”

The National Council of Nonprofits encourages non-profit boards to think carefully before finalizing a deal with a new executive leader and ask itself: “Are the assets of this non-profit being used prudently and to advance the mission?”

Play by the rules: The IRS has rules and regulations that aim to prevent non-profit organizations from overpaying their executive staff. If the non-profit board knowingly overpays an executive a salary the organization can’t afford, the IRS sees that as “excess compensation.” Penalties range from hefty fines to an organization losing its tax-exempt status.

Keep detailed records: Hiring a chief executive is one of the most important decisions a non-profit board has to make, and it should be documented as such. Non-profit board members will be asked by donors, supporters, reporters and perhaps the IRS to explain their hire and justify their salary and benefits.

Guidestar recommends a three-step process to ensure the board complies with IRS regulations and board members remain unbiased:

  • The board should approve compensation before an offer to the candidate is made and to ensure no board member has a conflict of interest related to the transaction.
  • The board should research comparable positions before approving compensation.
  • The board should document the decision-making process throughout the process.

Guidestar’s recommendations follow the IRS “rebuttable presumption of reasonableness” rules. In other words: The board is doing its due diligence and covering its bases while it makes a strategic, well-thought-out decision on executive compensation.

 

Hatch-Michelle-150x150

Michelle Hatch is a partner in our Non-Profit Services Group. She oversees audit and accounting engagements for non-profit organizations, including independent schools, trade associations, health and human service organizations and art, cultural and membership organizations. Michelle is also a member of the Employee Benefit Assurance Group and oversees audits for 401(k), 403(b) and defined benefit retirement plans.

 

The firm, with over 400 professionals and staff, offers a diversity of services, which includes auditing, accounting, tax, and business advisory services. In addition, BlumShapiro provides a variety of specialized consulting services, such as succession and estate planning, business technology services, employee benefit plan audits, litigation support, and valuation.  The firm serves a wide range of privately held companies, government and non-profit organizations and provides non-audit services for publicly traded companies.

Disclaimer: Any written tax content, comments, or advice contained in this article is limited to the matters specifically set forth herein. Such content, comments, or advice may be based on tax statues, regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof and we have no obligation to update any content, comments or advice for retroactive or prospective changes to such authorities. This communication is not intended to address the potential application of penalties and interest, for which the taxpayer is responsible, that may be imposed for non-compliance with tax law.

What are the responsibilities of individual non-profit board members?

shutterstock_275563196In my previous article, I laid out the overarching responsibilities of non-profit boards, which include big-picture strategic planning; selecting executive staff members; overseeing executive leadership; approving the organization’s budgets; overseeing compensation for staff members and leadership; and fundraising.

In this article, I will focus on the responsibilities of each individual board member.

Understand your fiduciary responsibilities

As members of non-profit organizations’ governing bodies, individual board members must adhere to the legal responsibilities of fiduciaries. A fiduciary is a “person who has the power and an obligation to act on behalf of another under circumstances that require total trust, good faith and honesty.”

As fiduciaries, non-profit board members have three specific legal duties:

  1. Duty of Care: To act with such care as an ordinary, prudent person would employ in your position.
  2. Duty of Loyalty: To act in good faith and in a manner you reasonably believe is in the best interest of the organization.
  3. Duty of Obedience: To be faithful to the organization’s mission. You are not permitted to act in a way that is inconsistent with the central goals of the organization. A basis for this rule lies in the public’s trust that the organization will manage donated funds to fulfill the organization’s mission.

Long story short: board members must, at all times, act in the best interest of the non-profit organizations they represent.

Educate yourself on the organization you represent

In order to responsibly serve on a non-profit’s board, members should understand the organization’s mission, strategic vision and financial situation. That means reviewing:

  • Audited financial statements of past years
  • The organization’s Form 990
  • Missions and values of the organization
  • The organization’s bylaws
  • The organization’s most recent strategic plan
  • Current financial statements

Once new board members are initiated, they should review all provided information in advance of board meetings, including financial information, so that each member is prepared to make informed and responsible decisions.

Joining committees to stay involved with the organization

Most non-profit boards have committees dedicated to specific organizational efforts. These committees vary based on the size and operations of each organization.

Individual board members should actively seek out committees relevant to their specific skill sets and interests.

 

Hatch-Michelle-150x150Michelle Hatch is a partner in our Non-Profit Services Group. She oversees audit and accounting engagements for non-profit organizations, including independent schools, trade associations, health and human service organizations and art, cultural and membership organizations. Michelle is also a member of the Employee Benefit Assurance Group and oversees audits for 401(k), 403(b) and defined benefit retirement plans.

The firm, with over 400 professionals and staff, offers a diversity of services, which includes auditing, accounting, tax and business advisory services. In addition, BlumShapiro provides a variety of specialized consulting services, such as succession and estate planning, business technology services, employee benefit plan audits, litigation support and valuation.  The firm serves a wide range of privately held companies, government and non-profit organizations and provides non-audit services for publicly traded companies.

Disclaimer: Any written tax content, comments, or advice contained in this article is limited to the matters specifically set forth herein. Such content, comments, or advice may be based on tax statues, regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof and we have no obligation to update any content, comments or advice for retroactive or prospective changes to such authorities. This communication is not intended to address the potential application of penalties and interest, for which the taxpayer is responsible, that may be imposed for non-compliance with tax law.